Issue related to state ownership and private ownership: Vietnam's emphasis on state-owned enterprises’ leading role is often a point used by critics to argue that Vietnam is a non-market economy. However, according to Steptoe LLP attorney Eric Emerson, representing Vietnam's Ministry of Industry and Trade, there is less government support for state-owned firms in Vietnam than in India, and more openness to foreign investment than in Indonesia, Canada and the Philippines – countries that have been recognised as market economies by the US.
Subsidies for state-owned enterprises have been cut, and in the recent National Party Congresses, the role of the private economy has been formally affirmed and emphasised. The Party Congress has set a goal of having two million enterprises by 2030, with the private sector contributing 60-65 per cent of the GDP.
Extent of government control over certain resources and prices: Vietnam has abandoned price controls. The 2023 Law on Prices excludes electricity, salt, and sugar, and retains only nine essential items that need price stabilisation, i.e. petrol, diesel, liquefied petroleum gas, infant formulas, rice, livestock feed, vaccines, pesticides, and essential medicines for humans. Intervention measures are also specified to only be used for a certain time and for urgent reasons such as natural disasters or supply chain disruptions.
Other factors: This is up to the US Department of Commerce to decide and can be affected by a number of other reasons.
Should the US consider Vietnam a market economy?
We should draw on the significant efforts that Vietnam has made. We can also look at 72 countries that have recognised Vietnam as a market economy, including large and/or developed economies such as China (2004), Russia and ASEAN members (2007), Australia, New Zealand (2008), India and South Korea (2009), Japan (2011), members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) such as Norway and Switzerland (2012), Canada (2016) and the United Kingdom (2023).
With Vietnam’s ongoing efforts and the recognition of major partners, Vietnam has essentially operated as a market economy and should be recognised by the US. However, opposition is coming from a number of lawmakers in the US Senate and House of Representatives, the Southern Shrimp Alliance, the American Shrimp Processors Association, and United Steelworkers, etc.
There will always be differing views in economics, stemming from the different interests of different parties. From Vietnam's side, after more than two decades of disadvantages in anti-dumping lawsuits, the recognition by the US will clear obstacles to Vietnam's exports and motivate the remaining trading partners to recognise Vietnam as a market economy.
For the US, to decide whether to delay or officially recognise Vietnam as a market economy, they will need to consider both for and against arguments. From an economic perspective, the government should make decisions based on total welfare and not a few interest groups.
Free trade will bring great benefits to consumers, such as lowering product prices, increasing choices, promoting cooperation, and expanding markets, although some domestic industries may no longer be protected. American businesses exporting to Vietnam and investing in production will benefit from Vietnam’s market economy designation.
The US needs to take advantage of the opportunity to continue building the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Vietnam, especially as its competitors are also taking advantage of their trade agreements signed with the Southeast Asian country.
Story: Phan Minh Hoa, Associate Lecturer in Economics, The Business School, RMIT University Vietnam
A version of this story was first published by The World & Vietnam Report. This story was updated on 26 July 2024.
Masthead image: Paul – stock.adobe.com